The Mechanical Handling and Storing of Material
Forfatter: A.-M.Inst.C E., George Frederick Zimmer
År: 1916
Forlag: Crosby Lockwood and Son
Sted: London
Sider: 752
UDK: 621.87 Zim, 621.86 Zim
Being a Treatise on the Handling and Storing of Material such as Grain, Coal, Ore, Timber, Etc., by Automatic or Semi-Automatic Machinery, together with the Various Accessories used in the Manipulation of such Plant
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
232 THE MECHANICAL HANDLING OF MATERIAL
two sections through the principal parts with the movable distributor d and the bend R
of the ejector pipe.
1 he hydraulic ejector by Körting, of injector fame, is represented in Fig. 321, and
shows distinct advances in the right direction. The
Fig. 319. Hochstein’s Method for Dis-
charging Ashes to Port or Star-
board of a Vessel.
ejector pipe b leads by a bend into the larger pipe c,
which terminates at the ship’s bottom, with an alter-
native side outlet under water at the side, as shown
in dotted lines; d is a perforated plate to prevent
dust, while e is an air inlet, which ensures that the
water level is the same in the pipe c as outside. The
following data are available in connection with this
ejector: The water used was of a pressure of 180
lb. per square inch, and passed to the ejector through
a 2j-in. pipe. The ejector used 3,300 gals, of water
to eject 7 to 8 tons of ashes to a height of 13 to
14 ft. through a 4-in. pipe.
Ejector Pipes.-—The bends in the ejector
pipes, which are practically indispensable in all the
foregoing installations, have been found to be sub-
ject to enormous wear and tear, as, owing to the
centrifugal force when negotiating bends, all the abrasion takes place on the one side
and under the most adverse circumstances. The pipes have, therefore, been made with
thicker metal on the side most affected, and also with renewable
liners, as well as lined with glass, which is harder than ashes and so
reduces the wear.
There can be no doubt that, where possible, the ideal exit for
he discharge of the ashes is vertically down through the ship’s
bottom, as this method has the following distinct advantages. The
discharge pipe is short and straight (without bends); it makes the
passage of pipes through the bunkers and decks unnecessary; the
condition of the weather is immaterial to the successful expulsion
of the ashes, contrary to side delivery above the water line, as such
installations have frequently to be fitted in duplicate, on the port
and on the starboard side, as already mentioned, so as to enable
the discharge of ashes to leeward in all weathers, and even then
a head or following wind will cause the seas to carry the ashes
back on to the deck, as well as into the stern tubes and sea suctions,
and the ashes will cause scoring of the skin plating at and below
the water line.
Latest Developments.—With the advent of the recent types
of battleships and cruisers with their powerful turbine engines, the
question of the mechanical disposal of the now enormous quanti-
ties of ashes has become a most important one. The non-inter-
ference with the existing structural arrangements was a sine qua
non. The Admiralty, while seeking a solution of the difficulty,
experimented with an ejector used in the French Navy, with a discharge through
the bottom of the ship, but it did not answer the requirements of the British Navy;
the naval authorities, therefore, experimented in the same direction, and eventually
produced a system by which the clinkers, ashes, and other refuse were first crushed
Fig. 320. Details of
the Principal Parts of
Fig. 319, in Front
and Side Views.