Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
184
HARBOUR ENGINEERING.
5 to 4 on both sides, had to be reduced 011 the sea face to 5 to 2, and a further
modification of the original design was the extension of the riprap 011 the port
side so as to afford an additional 16 feet of base. The original and modified
outlines are shown in the section. The work was completed in 1903. Un-
fortunately, the subséquent history of the breakwater has not been free from
disappointing incidents M. de Joly reports as follows : —
“ In spite of their great size the artificial blocks are not absolutely stable.
A north-westerly storm which occurred in February 1904, destroyed the
regularity and symmetry of the breakwater in a few hours : not only did the
blocks settle unevenly and cant slightly towards the interior, but some of
them becaine wedged in after pivotting about their western ends. The
displacement of the eastern ends amounted to as much as 6 inches, giving an
angular slew of ^j^.
“ An attempt was made to avoid any return by coucreting up the vertical
Fig. 157.—Section of Bizerta Breakwater.
joints, which occur every 100 feet or so; simultaneously the interior slope was
strengthened as previously described.
“The filling of the joints was just about finished when, at the end of
November 1904, a storm arose from the east and occasioned further important
dislocations. All the joints were split and some of the blocks seriously
damaged. Fears are entertained that any subsequent storm will so increase
these injuries as to completely fracture the joints and split the blocks
vertically.
“ It seems evident from the November experience, which is different from
that of the February one, that the width of 26 feet 3 inches is somewhat
insufficient for a 5000-ton block under existing circumstances, and that
undoubtedly it would have been preferable to increase the width to say
33 feet, leaving the vertical joints between the blocks open so as to allow
of settlement freely without tension or shear. Also, it may be questioned
whether it would not have been a better plan to make the topmost layers of