Kallundborg Kirke
Forfatter: Mogens Clemmensen, Vilh. Lorenzen
År: 1922
Forlag: Henrik Koppel
Sted: København
Sider: 62
UDK: st.f. 726.5(489)cle
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
med tilhørende Taarne, der mere end noget andet giver Kir«
ken Karakter, selvom disse Korsarme, som det allerede tidlis
gere er fremhævet, plantypologisk set er Centralpartiet unders
ordnede. Kan Centralpartiet siges at have haft Forbilleder ans
detsteds, lader Motivet med Korsarmene os derimod saa tems
melig i Stikken, om det end er muligt ogsaa her at knytte visse
Forbindelser mellem den danske Kirke og andre Monumenter
ude i Verden.
Korset med de 4 Ugelange Arme gaar i Almindelighed under
Benævnelsen det »græske« Kors. Men i Arkitekturen kan det
med ligesaa god Grund kaldes det »latinske«; thi det har ogs
saa i den latinske Verden haft en betydelig Udbredelse (Fig.
42), om det end ikke har faaet den Anvendelse som det saas
kaldte »latinske« Kors med længere Fjerdearm. I den romers
ske Kulturverden var Korset med de ligelange Arme — - som
overhovedet Centralanlæget — nøje knyttet til Gravkulturen.
Og Plantypen lever videre ind i Middelalderen.
I Kejser Justinians Tidsalder er den i Østen nøje knyttet
til Memorialkirker, først og fremmest den mægtige Apostels
kirke i Konstantinopel — en Rival til selve Hagia Sofia — med
Kuppel over Korsskæringen og Kuppel over hver af de 4 Korss
arme. Den var en Fornyelse og en Forstørrelse af en tidligere
af Konstantin opført, og til Gravkirke for ham selv bestemt
Kirke, komponeret over samme Planmotiv. Dette var ligeledes
anvendt i en anden Justiniansk Bygning, Evangelisten Johans
nes Kirke i Efesus og Typen holdt sig indenfor den byzantins
ske Kunstkreds endnu udover Justinians Tidsalder som særlig
anvendt i Memorialkirker. Der er ingen Tvivl om, at de to
store Justinianske Korskirker, der begge tilintetgjordes alles
rede i Middelalderen, er bleven efterlignet i den i Ilte Aarh.
ombyggede St. Marcus Kirke i Venedig j\ Men allerede Kons
stantins Apostelkirke havde været Forbillede for den 382 af
Ambrosius opførte Apostelkirke i Milano, senere, 396, inds
viet til St. Nazarius. Den hellige Ambrosius interesserede
sig overhovedet stærkt for Korssymbolet — en Interesse, der
snart bredte sig ogsaa i Vestens Lande, og i Frankrig rejste sig
i 5te Aarhundrede et Par Kirker, komponeret over det græske
Kors. Den ene af dem var den i Aarene efter 496 af Merovins
gerfyrsten Clodevig stiftede Gravkirke, indviet Apostlene 12.
Fra Milano er øjensynlig ogsaa Galla Placidias Gravkapel i
Ravenna inspireret.
Men særlig yndet blev denne Plantype ikke i Vestens Lan«
de efter Romerkulturens Sammenbrud. Længe holdt sig dog
en Forestilling om, at den særlig hørte til i Gravkirker og helt
op i 12te Aarh. kunde det hænde, at Gravkapeller havde Form
af et græsk Kors som Kirken i Schwartz«Rheindorf ved Bonn,
der blev anlagt ca. 1157 som Gravkapel for Ærkebiskop Ar«
nold af Kølln. Naar ogsaa Esbern Snares Borgkirke fik Form
af et græsk Kors, kunde det mulig skyldes, at han tillige har
tænkt sig den som en Gravkirke. Han blev dog efter sin Død
1204 ikke bisat her, men i Sorø Klosters Kirke, hvor ogsaa
hans Broder, den fremragende danske Statsmand, Ærkebiskop
Absalon, 3 Aar i Forvejen havde fundet sit Hvilested.
Den eneste endnu bevarede Kirke, der i sit Planprincip har
nogen Lighed med Esbern Snares Kirke er St. Marco i Vene«
dig 13. Men Sporene kan ogsaa pege i Retning af Milano og
Lombardiet, hvor den hellige Ambrosius’s Bygningsværker
This was a renewal and enlargement of a church built earlier
by Constantine on the same plan and destined for a mauso«
leum for himself. It had also been used in another of Justi«
nian’s buildings, the church of St.
John the Evangelist at Ephesus
and the type remains within the
circle of Byzantine art beyond the
time of Justinian, as one especially
adopted to memorial churches.
There is no doubt but that the
two great cruciform churches of
Justinian which were both de«
stroyed during the Middle Ages
are imitated in the church of St.
Mark’s at Venice, rebuilt during
the llth Century 1:1. However Con«
Fig. 41. St. Satiro i Milano. Plan.
— St. Satiro at Milan. Plan.
stantine’s church of the Apostle had already been the proto«
type for the church of the Apostle at Milan, built by Am«
brosius in 382, later, in 396, dedicated to St. Nazarius. The
holy Ambrosius was much interested in the cross as symbol,
—an interest which soon spread to the countries of the
west, so that in the 5th century in France, we find two
churches being built with the Greek cross as motive. One of
them was the mausoleum, built by the Merovingian prince,
Clodevig, and dedicated to the apostles ’2. From Milan, very
evidently, cornes the inspiration for the mausoleum of Galla
Placidia at Ravenna.
After the decline of Roman civilisation this type of plan
was not very populär in western lands. However the feeling
that it was especially suitable for mortuary chapels long pre«
vailed and far into the 12th century these were often given the
form of a Greek cross like the church in Schwarz«Rheindorf,
near Bonn, which was dedicated about 1157 as a mortuary
chapel for Archbishop Arnold of Cologne. That the castle«
church of Esbern Snare was given the form of a Greek cross
might possibly be due to the faet that he had perhaps intended
it as a mortuary chapel. Yet on his death in 1204, he was not
buried here, but in the church of Soro Cloister, where his bro«
ther, the eminent Danish statesman, Archbishop Absalon,
who had died three years previously, had also been laid to rest.
The only church still existing which, in any way, resembles
the church of Esbern Snare in plan is St. Mark’s in Venice 13.
However indications also point to Milan and Lombardy where
the architectural accomplishments of the holy Ambrosius may
have had imitators, even though these are no longer known.
The type of plan, then, of Kallundborg Church has, in its
main points, and especially in the central section, analogies
elsewhere though they are from distant centuries.
In its inner construction it was noticeable that the middle
bay of the central section was covered by a common cross«
vaulting of the same height as the cross«vaulting of the other
parts, and not covered by a dorne. At this point the resem«
blance to other churches fails and Kallundborg Church shows
a form of vaulting of its own.
However this is equally true of the external construction,
determined as it is by the towers of the transepts and with
33