A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Dock Engineering
Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham
År: 1904
Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company
Sted: London
Sider: 784
UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 340.18
With 34 Folding-Plates and 468 Illustrations in the Text
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
RESTRAINING FORCES.
171
TABLE XVI.—Approximate Weight per Cubic Foot of Various
Kinds of Earth.
Lbs.
Fine dry sand, loose, ... 90
,, ,, well shaken, .... ... 98
Coarse pit sand, 100
Damp river sand, ... 118
Quartz sand, 170
Gravel, . 90 to 95
Loose, dry shingle, 106
Mud, 102
Dry, common earth, loose, .... ... 95
Common earth, slightly moistened, 106
Densest and most compact earth, . 125
Loam, 125
Marl, ........ 100 to 120
Clay, 120 to 135
Chalk 117 to 174
Shale, ........ ... 162
Rubble filling (with interstices), 100
Surcharge.—The amount of surcharge upon a quay or dock wall can be
determined by reference to the weights of cargo to be deposited there and
of any superstructure upon the quay. A definite limit, however, is
generally fixed in the former case, beyond which wharfingers and others
should not be permitted to load quay spaces or shed floors, and an allowance
of about 3 tons per superficial yard will generally be found adequate to
cover all reasonable contingencies of sur-
charge. The effect of the surcharge should
be considered as extending from the vertical
back (actual or virtual) of the wall to the
intersection of the line of rupture with the
quay surface, and its line of action taken
as passing downwards through the centre of
this distance. Fig. 94 shows the method
of combining the effective pressures due to
the earth wedge and the surcharge. The
distance, F G, between their respective
centres of gravity is divided inversely in
the ratio of their weights, and the sum of the latter is taken as acting
through the point, K, thus found. It will be noticed that, in this way, the-
effect of the surcharge is not merely to increase the direct horizontal thrust
against the back of the wall, but, at the same time, to raise its point of
application and thus still further increase the overturning moment.
Having dealt with those forces which tend to disturb equilibrium, we-
now turn our attention to those which tend to maintain it.
Restraining Forces.. — The magnitude and line of action of the restraining
forces are open to less controversy and difference of opinion than is the case-
with the overturning forces. If the wall have a vertical back the dead.