A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Dock Engineering
Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham
År: 1904
Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company
Sted: London
Sider: 784
UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 340.18
With 34 Folding-Plates and 468 Illustrations in the Text
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
WIND.
227
generally representative of practice in this respect :—Barry has an
entrance channel, between breakwaters, 470 yards long. At Leith, a
similar channel extends to 660 yards. Sunderland has an enclosed outer
harbour affording a run of 900 yards. At Dover the present protected
length is 750 yards, but when the new works, now in progress, are com-
pleted there will be a sheltered reach of at least 1,100 lineal yards within
the breakwaters.
The objections attending a sea-exposed entrance are, of course, equally
potent in the case of ports situated on broad river estuaries, flanked by
low-lying country. Though the river inouth may be, to a certain extent,
considered as supplying the functions of an entrance channel, yet it is
often found expedient to provide a vestibule to the docks, in the form
of a tidal basin, having free communication with the river. This is the
plan adopted at the Liverpool and Birkenhead Docks, the Tilbury Docks
at London, the Royal Dock at Grimsby, and others. The Canada Basin
at Liverpool has an entrance width of 390 feet and a water area of
9| acres. The North Basin at Birkenhead has an entrance width of
500 feet and a water area of 4| acres, while at the Tilbury Basin the
entrance is 364 feet wide and the water area 17| acres.
In wide estuaries sheltered by ranges of hills, and narrow estuaries
generally, in land-locked bays and lagunes, and on inland rivers, the fore-
going precautions are rendered unnecessary, except for other and purely
local reasons.
The three natural agencies influencing the eligibility, or otherwise, of
a site for a dock entrance are (a) wind, (6) wave, and (c) current. It will
be well to subject them to a brief considération.
For the purpose of the present section we need not investigate the
effect of these natural forces except in so far as they favour or interfère
with the effective use of entrances, and the manipulation of vessels. Any
inquiry in regard to their action upon permanent structures will be
deferred until we corne to the chapter dealing with the parts most
affected—viz., jetties, wharfs, and piers.
Wind. —The power exerted by thewind is often sufficient to greatly impede,
if not absolutely prevent, the manæuvring of vessels (more particularly
those with a high freeboard), into and through a narrow, exposed water-
way. The effect is greatest when the direction of the wind is broadside
on, causing the vessel to fall off to the leeward. A head wind can always
be counteracted by adequate tractive or propelling power; in a side wind
this is of no avail, and the vessel has to be kept in her course by means of
ropes. Occasionally accidents happen through the breaking of these ropes
from excessive strain. Cases have occurred in which all the retaining
ropes to a vessel have snapped in quick succession, leaving her entirely
helpless. It is to be regretted that, at the present time, there is so little
reliable evidence in regard to the actual pressure exerted on large surfaces
by air in motion. Records have, indeed, been obtained showing very great