A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Dock Engineering
Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham
År: 1904
Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company
Sted: London
Sider: 784
UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 340.18
With 34 Folding-Plates and 468 Illustrations in the Text
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
438
DOCK ENGINEERING.
The kentledge is deposited in a spécial compartment called the ballast
box, arranged at the extremity of the tail end of the bridge, commonly
below the floor level, tliough the space between the webs of box girders is
also available for the purpose. The interior surfaces of the ballast box
should be washed over with liquid Portland cement, and the interstices
between the blocks run with grout, to prevent corrosion.
The counterpoise has occasionally been disposed as an ornamental
feature, and a massive balustrade or an entrance arch in cast iron may be
cited as illustrations. Such artistic pretensions are, however, in question-
able taste in situations where the functions of a bridge are strictly
utilitarian.
The arnount of ballast required to give the requisite stability depends
upon the ratio which the length of the tail bears to the length of the bridge
forward of the pivot or point of support. A bridge with the pivot exactly
at its centre, as is generally the case where two parallel openings have to
be spanned, and also for some single openings, as at Naburn on the Ouse,
near York, needs no counterweight. In the majority of cases a shorter tail
is the rule for two reasons—first, on the ground of expense, for the structure
of a bridge is far costlier than even a much greater dead weight of ballast;
and secondly, there is less occupation of valuable quay space by a counter-
balanced tail. In fact, at some sites, a short tail is absolutely unavoidable.
Tlie Whitehaven swing bridge has a tail only one-fourth of the total length,
or one-third of the length of the forward portion. In a number of cases the
proportion is one-half of the forward portion, while at Marseiiles it is
three-fifths. In an interesting paper on the subject, Mr. C. F. Findlay*
demonstrates, by an application of the calculus, that if the cost per ton of the
bridge structure be five times the cost of the kentledge, for any bridge not
of extremely minute span, the length of tail should be approximately one-
third of the length of the other section, if the most economical proportion
is to be observed.
Bridges which depend for their stability upon the downward reaction
of an inverted roller path do not of necessity require ballasting, if the path
itself be secure.
Ballast being an unremunerative form of weight, an attempt has been
made, in one case at least, to balance a bridge by placing the hydraulic
rams, which work it, within the ballast box. This method necessitates a
hollow pivot for the transmission of the water pressure. In the case of a
small bridge, the paving of the short end with stone setts, and the long end
with wood blocks, has been found an adéquate solution of the difficulty.
Setting Apparatus.—For obvious reasons it is not advisable to allow a
bridge to rest upon its pivot longer than is required for the operation
of turning. While undergoing the stress due to moving loads, the structure
is preferably supported on some independent base. Before the introduction
°f hydraulic power, when the usual practice was to carry the bulk of the.
* Findlay on “ The Design of Movable Bridges,” Min. Proc. L.E.S., vol. ii.