A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Dock Engineering
Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham
År: 1904
Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company
Sted: London
Sider: 784
UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 340.18
With 34 Folding-Plates and 468 Illustrations in the Text
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
CAPACITY.
465
the open. Hence gridirons, slipways, and lifts have a certain advantage
over docks, and, of the latter, the floating dock is more open than the
graving dock.
3. Light.—Artificial light can, of course, be provided, but natural light
is always better and more economical. The same comparison holds good as
in the case of ventilation.
Apart from these general requirements, there are various points of view
from which the advantages of the systems may be estimated, and, accordingly,
we will deal with these in order. Setting aside the gridiron as too primitive
and the hydraulic lift as now superseded by its development, the floating
dock, we may usefully confine our comparison to the remaining three types.
4. Capacity.—Although no apparent limitation attaches to the size of
slipways, yet it will be found that they have only been constructed for
a comparatively small class of vessel—those with lengths not exceeding
350 feet and dead weights of not more than 5,000 tons. This arises from
three causes: first, the excessive length of slipway, both above and below
water, required for the reception of larger ships ; secondly, the liability of
sucli ships to undergo strain during the process of getting them on to the
cradle ; and, thirdly, the difliculty of keeping a very large slipway remunera-
tively engaged. Theoretically, there is no reason why a ship of any length
and weight should not be supported npon a slipway of sufficient size and
stability, and to economical reasons alone must be attributed the main
objection to its more extended utility.
Judging from existing examples, the size of graving and floating docks is
restricted by no such consideration, and their maximum capacity has yet to
be determined. Every succeeding year witnesses an increase in dimensions.
As regards their relative capacities there is some difliculty in instituting a
comparison, for that of a graving dock is based upon its linear dimensions,
the weight of any incoming vessel not entering into account, while a floating
dock, open at each end, is gauged by the weight which it can lift, and is
practically independent of size. The largest vessels, designed or in existence
at the present time, are nearing or have reached a length of 760 feet, a beam
of 78 feet, a loaded draught of 36 feet, and a displacement of upwards of
38,000 tons. The largest graving docks have lengths of over 850 feet,
entrances more than 85 feet wide, and a draught of water on sill at high
water of ordinary spring tides somewhat exceeding 32 feet. While the
superficial area of such graving docks is largely in excess of all present
requirements, it will be noticed that there is an apparent insufficiency in
draught, and this fact is often alleged as a disqualification. But in the
great majority of cases, a vessel will discharge the whole or the larger part
of her cargo before entering the dock and so reduce her draught by several
feet. At the same time, it must be admitted that the margin thus obtained
is by no means a large one, and it frequently disappears at neap tides, while
there is always the remote contingency of a seriously damaged vessel having
to be docked fully loaded immediately upon its arrival at a port. It is an
30