A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Dock Engineering
Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham
År: 1904
Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company
Sted: London
Sider: 784
UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 340.18
With 34 Folding-Plates and 468 Illustrations in the Text
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
468
DOCK ENGINEERING.
displacement of a vessel of this size would be at least 25,000 tons, and,,
according to Herr Howaldt and Messrs. Clark and Standfield alike, the
cost of a floating dock to receive her would lie between £225,000 and
£250,000. Or, looking at the matter another way, the proportion of
deadweight of a floating dock to lifting power, from a number of examples,
averaging about 45 to 100, the deadweight of a floating dock as above
would be 11,250 tons, which at, say, £20 per ton (to include all fittings and
pumping machinery), cornes to £225,000 as before. This is without taking
into consideration any ancillary works, such as shore connections, site
dredging, &c. So that, as regards the cost of the largest docks, the balance
inclines in favour of the graving dock. This opinion receives confirmation
in the report ofthe engineer (Mr. Wm. Ferguson) to the Port of Wellington,
N.Z., who after a tour of inspection of the repairing docks in Great Britain,
Australia, and the United States, recommends the adoption of a concrete
graving dock for that port as less expensive than a floating dock of similar
capacity.*
6. Maintenance and Repairs.—The structures of slipways and graving
docks, if solidly built in the first instance, require very little attention
afterwards, whereas owing to the destructive action of salt water on
ironwork, floating docks call for regular inspection and frequent painting.
In slipways the cradle wheels occasionally get broken, but this item should
equitably be included in repairs to machinery, which are common to all
three types, though possibly a more pronounced item in floating docks.
The structural repairs of a concrete or masonry graving dock, with
greenheart gates, are infinitesimal. If iron gates are used, they will
necessitate some expense of upkeep, as against a reduction in their cost
of construction compared with wooden gates. No doubt, the timber
graving docks prevalent in the United States require extensive repairs
from time to time, but in this case also, the capitalised amount is balanced
by a corresponding economy in initial expenditure, and they represent,
moreover, a very limited class.
According to some statistics, supplied by Messrs. Clark and Standfield,
the average annual cost of upkeep of iron floating docks ranges between
•75 and 1'5 per cent, of the invested capital. The former figure represents
exceptional care in primary preparation, the outside surfaces being par-
ticularly well painted and “the whole of the mill-scale having sweated off
before launching, so that the paint was fairly on the iron.”
7. Working Expenses.—In this respect the floating dock exhibits an
economy far beyond that of the graving dock, because, in the former case,
the quantity of water to be removed by pumping is little more than the
actual displacement of the vessel which is being docked, while in the latter
case, unless any assistance can be rendered by a falling tide, the volume
of water to be pumped out is the cubic contents of the graving dock, less
the displacement of the ship. Furthermore, while for a graving dock the
* Report on Docking Facilities for the Port of Wellington, 1901.