A Treatise On The Principles And Practice Of Dock Engineering
Forfatter: Brysson Cunningham
År: 1904
Forlag: Charles Griffin & Company
Sted: London
Sider: 784
UDK: Vandbygningssamlingen 340.18
With 34 Folding-Plates and 468 Illustrations in the Text
Søgning i bogen
Den bedste måde at søge i bogen er ved at downloade PDF'en og søge i den.
Derved får du fremhævet ordene visuelt direkte på billedet af siden.
Digitaliseret bog
Bogens tekst er maskinlæst, så der kan være en del fejl og mangler.
DESIGN OF FLOATING DOCKS. 481
stable than the depositing dock, though the latter is, of course, well within
the limits of practical safety. Another difference between the two types
is that the off-shore dock is constructed in one continuons pontoon, which
is a lighter form of construction than the separate caissons of the depositing
dock.
Design of Floating Docks.
The design of floating structures being the particular province of the
naval architect, it is manifestly outside the range of the present work to
enter into a discussion of any of the specific problems or details connected
with the disposition and arrangement of floating docks. The broad prin-
ciples of the equilibrium of floating bodies have already been enunciated,
in connection with the subject of dock caissons, in Chapter viii., and it
would certainly be inadvisable to do more than supplement the information
therein contained by a few remarks of a general nature, relating to the
subject at present under considération.
In the first place, then, with a given length and displacement, an increase
in breadth means an increase in stability, hence a broad beam is an advan-
tage to a floating dock. The usual proportion of beam to draught lies
between 8 and 10 to 1.
Fig. 465. Fig- 466-
Secondly, a rectangular transverse section has a lower centre of gravity
than a curved section, and therefore is more stable. It has already been
pointed out that docks with elliptical or U-shaped profiles were fitted with
gates; the object of these is to lower the centre of gravity.
Thirdly, the less the height of the sides, consistent with the require-
ments of shoring, the less tendency there will be to top-heaviness, with
the concurrent advantages of greater light and ventilation in dealing with
vessels to be repaired.
Lastly, the more compartments in a cross-section, the greater the stability
under wat’er ballast. This is evident from figs. 465 and 466, which repre-
sent two floating tanks containing water, and slightly displaced. The
distribution of the water after displacement is much more uniform in
the subdivided tank than in the other, and there is also less surging
motion.